This is an interview where Jarre explains the insight of Oxygene 7-13, promotes its through talking about the touring he’s wishful to do with the album.
Q: What inspired you to write and record Oxygene 7-13?
JMJ: ‘The idea behind Oxygene 7-13 was not to do a Rocky II. It was more an idea of continuing something I had done a few years ago. And I had this idea almost as soon as I had completed the first ‘Oxygene’. I didn’t necessarily plan to do this Oxygene 7-13 this year. It could have been last year or next year. But it happened like this and at the moment where it seems that a lot of people seem to be more and more interested by analogue instruments and analogue synthesisers, to go back. It’s like for a guitar player to play on an old Stratocaster for instance, instead of getting the latest midi guitar, whatever. In a sense, I would say, that if it is not my unplugged album it is a kind of replugged album for me. To be replugged to my roots, to this kind of excitement I always felt by working on textures and working on sounds with no particular strategy but just having fun dealing with sounds.’
Q: How did you approach writing and recording Oxygene 7-13?
JMJ: ‘The main excitement for me of making music is really dealing with textures, with colours. Almost considering sounds like actors, like when you are directing actors on a stage. It is the same kind of attitude I’ve always been interested in. And it was to this Oxygene 7-13 — 7-13 because the first one was part 1 to 6, was really to try to approach composition in this way rather than playing a melody or playing a tune. Starting with raw elements or structures exactly like when you are starting a sculpture on the stone, when you have just the raw elements and then you deal with these raw elements and from time to time you have shapes, give birth to shapes, and it’s exactly what I try to do in this project by, for instance, using instruments like Mellatron or Theramin, but also the first old analogue synthesisers where you can really deal with the actual shape of the sounds. And then working, I mean trying to assemble sounds like in nature, I mean you have a lot of things that are not necessarily made to, co-exist. It’s like your fingers, you know the shape of each finger with time is taking the shape of its neighbour. When you are a kid your fingers are quite straight and with time one finger takes the shape of the next one. It’s exactly the same with sound. Time for each sound being shaped by its neighbour. And so a part of this, a big part of the composition on this project, has been to work on the console, to actually, I would say, knead, like you are kneading clay. Kneading sounds.’
Q: How does this continuation compare with Oxygene 1-6?
JMJ: ‘I felt that the first Oxygene has a kind of transparency quality because of the minimalist approach. The fact that you have now so many layers so each layer is much more important because it has some space, and the idea of allowing time for each part to develop. It has been the most difficult thing for me that, for the new one. I think the new one has a different pace anyway. I mean its a true continuation, because the second one is a development of the first one. It’s not exactly the same mood. It’s a mood later.’
Q: How did you keep the minimalist approach?
JMJ: ‘One of my ideas at the beginning was never in this project using more than 8 elements if not 8 tracks but not more than 8 elements at a time. I succeeded more or less. And because it gives them space to each sound. It gives a kind of oxygen to each sound.’
Q: Has the way you work changed over the years?
JMJ: ‘When you are doing your first work, shooting your first movie, when you are writing your first book, when you are doing your first record, you are doing it in a very unconscious way. It’s not instant, because it carries actually all what you have been through since you have been born. And then after this kind of rather unconscious way of making music the following projects are trying to adjust, to be in contradiction, to explore other fields, and then when I went back to this new Oxygene it was with the idea of going back to this rather unconscious way of perceiving sounds. By using originally the same instruments, so I went back, mainly to the first instruments as a starting point. The first analogue instruments. The first instruments I ever have ever used in my life. They are like, I would say, part of a personal museum, almost. They seem these days like a Stradivarius of electronic music. The old Moogs, the old harps, the old Mellotron or Theramin. I never felt such a kind of possibility of being central, being like a craftsman. I mean really working with your hands and being tactile rather than just intellectual. With electronic instruments rather than acoustic instruments. It’s not a problem of making comparisons and saying what is the best. It is just a different attitude. And I’ve always been fascinated, almost like a child, by this kind of analogue gear where you can really, I mean, I would say, fiddle about, play with sounds and play with, not with concepts, but actually with ingredients.’
Q: Where did you get the inspiration for Oxygene 7-13?
JMJ: ‘For this project I tried also to move a lot, to travel a lot, to try to get not necessarily influences in terms of sounds, but influences in terms of landscapes and moods. To try not to come in to the recording studio with just preconceived ideas of themes or sounds but trying to trap myself in different situations by experimenting in various places, or various countries almost like when you are playing the violin. I used one keyboard and one small recorder just exactly like with an acoustic guitar, or with a violin or a portable instrument. To be able to make music on top of a mountain or by the sea or in the country or anywhere, to try to break the walls of the recording studio basically.’
Q: How did you maintain the feel of the recording?
JMJ: ‘The whole project has been done by hand I would say. I mean from the beginning where I really started the composition process and writing the tracks and doing the tracks really with one instrument and one small recorder, a small desk that could work on batteries so I could travel and do some music wherever. And during the recording process I used a lot of analogue processes also. I mean having sounds, playing sounds through small speakers as well as having old analogue tape recorders, I used a lot of tape echoes and not digital kind of delays but tape delays with old instruments, with old tape recorders like the Revox. And also in the mixing process, mixing by hand gave an entirely different situation. The way of dealing continuously with the old textures but also you have the possibility to do 20 totally different mixes in 1 hour. And this kind of almost considering your mixes like when you are using a Polaroid and suddenly having a lot of possibilities, also makes you much less passive in front of technology, because in an automated mixing situation you are always a spectator of your work. When you are mixing by hand, you have to recondition yourself each time to go back to square one, to go back to scratch and play the whole piece again. Exactly like when you are playing with a keyboard or playing with a guitar. The whole piece again. Instead of, for instance, asking somebody to do a chorus on an electric guitar and saying oh yes could you redo that, could you replay that particular note. The rest is fine — it’s just impossible. I mean mixing by hand is exactly the same thing. I mean if you are starting from square one you replay and reinterpret the whole piece so it has that kind of freshness and spontaneity that you may lose with an automated mix.’
Q: How important is the mixing stage?
JMJ: ‘The mixing for this project has really been part of composition. Doing the tracks and doing the tunes by not only in a mixing situation when you are for instance you think that you should have more bass, in the information processes as we know it, you just move the bass. In that kind of music if you move the bass slightly you are changing the whole perspective of the soundscape. So you have actually to reposition everything and this constant repositioning that the manual mix allows, gives a kind of special life to the sounds that was quite important for this piece of music.’
Q: Do you enjoy the concept of the remix?
JMJ: ‘What I like with the remixing situation is it helps to make the process of finishing the album, as you said before, less painful because you can still continue to be immersed in your own work for weeks. Because I mean, you are remixing the first single, then you have the second single, the third single. It’s a process that can last forever. It’s what you have to stop at one stage, but it is quite nice because you can experiment on the finished project which is also quite exciting.’
Q: How important is the album cover artwork?
JMJ: ‘I always thought that the album cover is very important. Even more important for what I’m doing than for an album made of songs. The idea is to try to give an opportunity to have a kind of visual continuation. So for this part of the project I wanted to work with the artist who did the first one, obviously. And he’s a French artist called Michel Granger and he did a few covers for me. One was Oxygene, Equinoxe, and Rendez-Vous also, and this new one had to also be a kind of continuation for him. And he went with the idea of reversing the process where you had a human skull, a human presence in the earth for the first one and on the cover of the second one is the earth inside a human figure. The first one it was a not necessarily a statement but it was linked with all this ecological problems that the late 70s had to face.
By the end of the century it is more linked to, I would say, surviving day to day life. And I like very much the idea of Michel Granger about having the earth inside a human figure and the earth is the heart of that guy, of this creature. And I think it’s good when you put the covers back to back it’s quite interesting, it’s a nice graphic statement. I like this kind of poetic way of continuing the first idea.’
Q: What is the concept behind the video for the single Oxygene 8?
JMJ: ‘Kevin Godley is the director doing the first video with the idea of the music being the interface between the inside world and the outside world. I mean a kind of meditation on the letter O, of the symbol O of Oxygene. And then he created a sort of device with lenses of various diameters, where you can see through. I can see through to the outside world and you can see me through, I mean in a kind of distorted way, through these lenses. But you know you start with a very nice idea and you never know what’s going on. That is part of chance. I mean 7-13, 7 and 13 are very interesting numbers because 7 is a lucky number and 13 is a chance number so I don’t know at the moment where we are, between 7 and 13. Actually I know where it is — we are at number 8. Because the first single is Oxygene 8.’
Q: Do you enjoy the video making process?
JMJ: ‘I’m not particularly obsessed to be the centre or the star of the video.
I think it entirely depends on what we want to do. When we started with this first video I said to Kevin look at me, it’s dependent on the concept. I mean I know that some people want to see the artist in the video but sometimes if a concept doesn’t fit with the fact that you are in it, the fact of being there, being in the video may be artificial.’
Q: What excites you about the Internet?
JMJ: ‘I am very excited by the Internet concept. It seems to me that actually we don’t talk enough about the magic and poetic aspect, the poetic side of Internet and if so many around the world are excited by the Internet or Cyberspace, even without knowing what it is or having almost most of the people not using the Internet, but they are all fascinated by the Internet because of what it carries. So as an artist I am actually even more excited by this aspect of playing with what Internet means than actually working on the Internet most of the time, because still today, it has a kind of heavy process to get into. And I would like to say that the Internet is great until you are facing your computer.
The Internet is one of the first concepts that definitely belongs to the 20th Century and we are pioneering it, which is the excitement about the Internet. It’s amazing to see how fascinated we are by the kind of very rough video animation, when we have HD video or HD TV, but we are still fascinated by something that is so rough in terms of technology, that carries a dream of pioneering in new territories.’
Q: What are the plans for the Oxygene tour?
JMJ: ‘The Oxygene tour is going to be something totally different from my recent productions, where I have been involved with specific outdoor projects, involving architecture, involving environment, involving a lot of visual techniques I developed over the last 12 to 15 years.
The next Oxygene tour is about an indoor and more intimate concept, for theatre, for arenas, involving theatrical effects as well as computer images, and I mean a mixture of past and future in terms of visual techniques, and the whole idea is to focus this Oxygene tour on the music itself, and on the idea of performing the music and ‘scenography’, it is around the music, with the performance being the main thing, which will be for me rather a change from the recent productions where the concept was sometimes more important. This was the whole idea about the concept I have done in Houston, China and all over the world these past few years, that the concept was the performance itself.’
Q: Is it going to be very different performing indoors?
JMJ: ‘Being outdoor is a different process because actually for free concerts outdoor, I mean the theatre is where the crowd is, and what’s nice about it is that the crowd creates the theatre, and the audience creates the theatre by just being there. In an indoor situation you have a totally different approach and totally different contact with the audience. What I would like to get and experiment with that kind of music, with that kind of musical project where you don’t have a singer actually performing, where the music is going to perform, not by itself, but assisted by the ‘scenography’. So the intimate venues are going to give a different sense, a different meaning to the music, I hope.
I am quite excited by the idea of touring, for me it’s a kind of first time because all my concerts have been, even the tours I have made, have involved totally different concepts, so it’s my first indoor tour, so I am quite excited by it. It’s a new field to explore, for me.
Much more intimate but also open to the outside world through, maybe, some Internet or also some Online type of situation. I like the idea of using a kind of theatre situation with an Online situation also — trying to mix those 2 worlds. This world means the very traditional theatre mood with the Internet — this kind of mixture.’
Q: How would you sum up your work at this stage of your career?
JMJ: ‘Oxygene carries who I am. It takes time to assume who you are, to accept that you’re not doing jazz or rap or classical music or rock or whatever — you are able to do one thing in your life and try to improve this thing and that I think you have to repeat. I’m a great believer in the idea that you have to repeat yourself, over and over and over again, to make it happen, to finally find what you are trying to express. I mean everybody is doing the same movie, everybody is doing the same record but each time trying to improve or to reject what he has done in the past, and then at one stage you are in phase with yourself and the audience and I hope Oxygene 7-13 carries the touch of naiveté or spontaneity that I had for the first one, linked with experience and where I am today.